Friday, February 25, 2011

YA Literature: The Promise of a Poorly Labeled Literary Genre

          Defining Young Adult (YA) Literature is difficult.  Publishers and book sellers would have us believe this is a genre of literature specifically for 12 to 18-year-olds.  But who among us really thinks of a 12-year-old as a young adult?  Most of the 12-year-olds I know are excited about becoming a teen on their next birthdays.  The fact is that the age range itself poses one of the biggest stumbling blocks when trying to define YA Literature.  Furthermore, what does this age range say about the millions of adult readers who devour popular YA titles?  In the end, I have to agree with Stephen Roxburgh's assessment.  Discussion of the intended audience of YA Literature gets in the way of defining it as an art form.  In The Art of the Young Adult Novel, he wrote that  "There is no difference between the young adult novel and the adult novel. There are distinctions to be made between them, but they are not different art forms" (2005, p.5).
          The Young Adult label may, in fact, do a disservice to this genre.  Labels can be a huge advantage to parents and teachers when trying to determine appropriate materials for the children they are guiding through the formative years.  Likewise, labels also lure those same adults with the promise of an easy solution.  On several occasions, when my busy life left me no time for the necessary investigations, I have made the big mistake of approving movies for my children to see based solely on the movie rating.  The YA label provides that same false sense of security.  Typically, a huge difference in maturity exists between the ages of 12 and 18.  Few books are able to successfully span that gap.  So why have a label that leads consumers to believe a wealth of such material is readily available?
          Our society, and most others, believes that adults have a responsibility to protect those not yet ready or able to protect themselves.  So, in that sense, I think there is a bit of the literary moralist living in all of us.  I am concerned about what my children read just as I am concerned about what they watch.  However, I am firmly against censorship.  At times, I've told my children "not yet" with regard to reading a book.  I value the teaching opportunities presented by good literature with challenging themes and recognize the need support my children in their efforts to grapple with such texts.  This includes making sure they are emotionally ready for the text and providing opportunities to discuss the text while reading it.  I carry the same concern and sense of responsibility into my future classroom.
          As Marc Aronson points out in his article entitled How Are Our Children Affected by the Books in Their Lives? (2004), books seldom influence children to behave in ways they don't want to behave.  His example is one to which every parent can relate.  Lovely bedtime stories often don't result in a sleeping child.  Were they that effective, hospitals would send new parents home armed with copies of Goodnight Moon.  That is not to say books can't produce positive results in our lives.   When I was 10 or 11,  I read The Five Little Peppers and How They Grew (1881) by Margaret Sidney.  At one point in the story, the Pepper children join forces to make raisin muffins.  After reading that passage, I went to our kitchen, pulled out Mom's Betty Crocker Cookbook, and made raisin muffins.  I was forever cured of my dislike of raisins.  I can think of a handful of similar examples that resulted from exposure to ideas represented in the books I read.  Interestingly, I cannot remember reading any book that produced a negative response aside from the occasional nightmare.  As an educator, I feel confident that students can read books for pleasure or for school without risk of being enticed into deviant or self-destructive behaviors.
          So, what should be the role of YA Literature in the English classroom?  Again, I have to return to this notion of YA  as art.  Art belongs in the classroom.  It informs us of the past and present.  It enlightens us as to the possibilities of the future.  Art engages us in a conversation about the most important issues facing humanity.  In Beyond the Pale, Aronson explains that, "Teaching young people about art gives them the ability to make something, a magic mirror that reveals more of themselves to themselves than they knew was there, and it gives them a connection to the great art and artists of the past, each of whom created another shard, another fraction of the reflecting glass" (2003, p.28)
          Teachers must sift through YA Literature in order to bring its masterpieces into the classroom.  The sheer volume of the genre makes this seem like an impossible task; however, organizations such as the Young Adult Library Service Association (YALSA) make the process less daunting.  As I've learned from the Eva Perry Mock Printz Club , our high school students are capable of helping us locate these masterpieces as well.  High quality YA Literature is a powerful bridging tool.   Aronson advocates the use of YA as a bridge to span the generation gap.  He explains, "One way, then, to bridge the generation gap is to write a book that is so true, so powerful, it captures the essence of adolescence, rather than the vagaries of growing up in one time or another" (2003, p.88).  A hallmark of the classic is the quality of timelessness.  In Adolescent Literature as a Complement to the Classics, Joan Kaywell demonstrates that contemporary literature can function as a bridge to facilitate understanding of literary canon (2000, Volume 4, Chapter 9).  The ability to expand the reader's understanding of the world is yet another indication of literary quality.  YA also has the ability to bridge understanding of cultures as Kaywell's book illustrates.  As the demographics of the American classroom continue to diversify, the value of YA will undoubtedly increase.
          It's a big job and an important one.  Turning our backs on the potential of YA Literature in the classroom would ultimately limit our students.  It is a far more exciting prospect to involve our students in discovering the classics of the future. 
bookhenge

3 comments:

  1. I found your comments from the perspective of a parent helpful to me since I am not a parent. I had not really considered the words of Aronson in that light despite his frequent references to his role as a father. I also think you hit the nail on the head with the point about YAL being a bridge to the full literary canon. Maureen made a similar point in her blog entry. Your final paragraph really resonated with me and was somewhat convicting. As I wrote in my blog and like you, I seek with vigor that which will help my students read, and if YAL is the ticket, I'll take an entire roll.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You began to use the metaphor of the bridge in your FOKI, Jen, and it's proving to be a bridge itself throughout your writing.

    I'd suggest thinking of the "12 to 18" age range for YA as a continuum. Some books fall at the lower, younger end and some at the higher. The Newberry Award actually overlaps at age 12 and so many Newberry, ie Gaiman's The Graveyard Book appeal to many readers along the continuum and beyond. He doesn't have a million and a half Twitter followers made up of 12 to 18 year-olds.

    So you're right that as a label, YA only gives you a nod in the right direction but you then need to check reviews (conveniently often included in online book sellers' pages)from reputable sources like Booklist and ALA lists.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jen--

    What a great and poignant post. I wholly agree with you that YA literature certainly cannot span accross six years of development, especially considering how much changes over those six years. Many of the books that I have read for bookhenge thus far (I think you and I have read many of the same, actually) is certainly not suited for all age groups. The graphic beginning of "If I Stay" would be very damaging (in my opinion) to many 12-15 year-olds. Also, the themes as well as language used in "Will Grayson, Will Grayson" and "Numbers" is something that I feel are not appropriate (or accessible for that matter) for younger teenagers. You make a very compelling point about movie ratings, and it's something I had never considered before. The themes in a PG-13 film may be a bit too dull for a 15-16 year-old, but they certainly may not be ready for a rated-R flick. What would you suggest? Perhaps a new leaf should be turned in the way we rate and categorize films as well?

    With my very best,
    Frederik

    ReplyDelete